{"id":1462,"date":"2017-09-25T16:41:17","date_gmt":"2017-09-25T13:41:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/?p=1462"},"modified":"2022-05-17T15:57:19","modified_gmt":"2022-05-17T12:57:19","slug":"fppr-senior-scholar-seminar-prof-ted-hopf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/en\/2017\/09\/fppr-senior-scholar-seminar-prof-ted-hopf\/","title":{"rendered":"FPPR Senior Scholar Seminar: Prof. Ted Hopf"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The Distribution of Identity in International Politics and Hegemonic Transition<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On September 19, 2017, Prof. Ted Hopf, Professor of Political Science at National University of Singapore, addressed a Senior Scholar Seminar at Bilkent University.<\/p>\n<p>Prof. Hopf spoke on the subject of his forthcoming project entitled \u201cThe Distribution of Identity in International Politics and Hegemonic Transition\u201d. He started with explaining the conventional view that accepts hegemonic transition as being the transfer of economic-military power from one power to another; and explained the inadequacy of this view for answering central questions regarding the future of international order.<\/p>\n<p>Prof. Hopf argues that hegemonic transition or the future of international order is \u201cshaped not only by material power but also by the distribution of identity across the great powers\u201d. To better assess how this view supports the current Western hegemony, he presented empirical analysis that mapped out the distribution of identity among nine great powers \u2013 Brazil, China, Russia, the UK, the US, France, Germany, India, and Japan \u2013 at both the mass and elite levels. Before answering the audience\u2019s questions, Prof. Hopf concluded his speech highlighting the findings that explain how and why China is unlikely to become the hegemon in the short-term.<\/p>\n<div class=\"owl_slider slider-large content-sliders owl-carousel builder_slider\">\n<div class=\"item_slide\"><a class=\"feature-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3647-e1506346686987.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3647-e1506346686987.jpg\" \/><\/a><div class=\"item_slide_caption shortcode_slider\"><h1><\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"item_slide\"><a class=\"feature-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3651.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3651.jpg\" \/><\/a><div class=\"item_slide_caption shortcode_slider\"><h1> <\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"item_slide\"><a class=\"feature-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3639.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/IMG_3639.jpg\" \/><\/a><div class=\"item_slide_caption shortcode_slider\"><h1> <\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Distribution of Identity in International Politics and Hegemonic Transition On September 19, 2017, Prof. Ted Hopf, Professor of Political Science at National University of Singapore, addressed a Senior Scholar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1469,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fppr-senior-scholar-series-en"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1462\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}