{"id":3438,"date":"2024-10-03T11:38:14","date_gmt":"2024-10-03T08:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/?p=3438"},"modified":"2024-10-03T11:38:24","modified_gmt":"2024-10-03T08:38:24","slug":"pathways-for-global-ir-a-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/en\/2024\/10\/pathways-for-global-ir-a-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Pathways for Global IR: A Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>As CFPPR and Bilkent IR, we hosted a thought-provoking debate on &#8220;Pathways for Global IR,&#8221; featuring Prof. Ay\u015fe Zarakol and Prof. Ersel Ayd\u0131nl\u0131, with moderation by Asst. Prof. Se\u00e7kin K\u00f6stem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The debate explored alternative pathways to Global International Relations (IR), examining its definition, potential directions, and the advantages and disadvantages of integration, incorporation, and revolution. Additionally, it considered the roles of various actors and venues in advancing Global IR, the impact of language on scholarship, and the challenges faced in acknowledging the Global South\u00a0 perspectives within the global discourse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As CFPPR and Bilkent IR, we hosted a thought-provoking debate on &#8220;Pathways for Global IR,&#8221; featuring Prof. Ay\u015fe Zarakol and Prof. Ersel Ayd\u0131nl\u0131, with moderation by Asst. Prof. Se\u00e7kin K\u00f6stem. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3439,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3438"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3438\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3443,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3438\/revisions\/3443"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}