{"id":865,"date":"2016-09-24T21:38:31","date_gmt":"2016-09-24T18:38:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/?p=865"},"modified":"2018-11-08T12:14:26","modified_gmt":"2018-11-08T10:14:26","slug":"2nd-all-azimuth-workshop-on-homegrown-theorizing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/en\/2016\/09\/2nd-all-azimuth-workshop-on-homegrown-theorizing\/","title":{"rendered":"2nd All Azimuth Workshop on Homegrown Theorizing"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Center for Foreign Policy and Peace\u00a0Research (CFPPR) organized its second workshop bringing together Turkish and international scholars to discuss the topic of homegrown theorizing in international relations, on September 23-24, 2016 at Bilkent University, Ankara. The organization was funded by the \u0130hsan Do\u011framac\u0131 Peace Foundation.<\/p>\n

This is the Center\u2019s second workshop on this subject, in a series called the All Azimuth Workshops on Homegrown Theorizing. The name comes from the center\u2019s flagship journal, All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, as the purpose of both the workshops and the journal is one and the\u00a0same: to encourage independent conceptualization in the periphery and ease the wider dissemination of such scholarly efforts. In doing so, we aim to contribute to the dialogue between the “center” and “the periphery,” and help transcend the conventional theoretical, methodological, geographical, academic and cultural barriers between the two.<\/p>\n

The workshop started with a welcoming speech by the CFPPR\u2019s General Coordinator Prof. Ersel Ayd\u0131nl\u0131, and featured four panels, during which a select group of scholars from around the world discussed:<\/p>\n

a. the discipline’s organization and inner structuring with respect to conditions\/constraints related to original theory production in the periphery,
\nb. efforts to redefine mainstream\/core concepts with input from various regions\/countries around the world,
\nc. original theory building efforts from various regions\/countries around the world by relying on indigenous perspectives,
\nd. different strategies for the improvement of International Relations as a discipline.<\/p>\n

Participant scholars concluded the workshop with a fruitful roundtable session that raised a number of questions addressing two main issues: how to widen International Relations theory to include global alternatives, and the strategies for the periphery to globalize International Relations theory.<\/p>\n

Speakers:<\/em>
\nErsel Ayd\u0131nl\u0131, Bilkent University
\nGonca Biltekin, CFPPR
\nChing-Chang Chen, Ryukoku University
\nEy\u00fcp Ersoy, Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Beyaz\u0131t University
\nKnud Erik Jorgensen, Ya\u015far University
\nEmilian Kavalski, Australian Catholic University
\nPeter Marcus Kristensen, University of Copenhagen
\nDeniz Kuru, Turkish German University
\nAndrey Makarychev, University of Tartu
\nSiddharth Mallavarapu, South Asian University
\nHomeira Moshirzadeh, Tehran University
\nHaluk \u00d6zdemir, K\u0131r\u0131kkale University
\nChih-yu Shih, National Taiwan University
\nKosuke Shimizu, Ryukoku University
\nKaren Smith, University of Cape Town<\/p>\n

\n
<\/a>

Prof. Dr. Ersel AYDINLI <\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n
<\/a>

<\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n
<\/a>

<\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n
<\/a>

<\/h1><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Center for Foreign Policy and Peace\u00a0Research (CFPPR) organized its second workshop bringing together Turkish and international scholars to discuss the topic of homegrown theorizing in international relations, on September […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":871,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[69],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-workshop-conference"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/865\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.foreignpolicyandpeace.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}